It is important to know and evaluate how activated sludge
physically acts at the bottom of the final clarifier because sludge deposition
and removal are critical to the mass loading (lb/day/ft2) design
factor as well as to the concentrations of return and waste sludge. Examination
of the logic and data from field installations provides an insight into the
sludge blanket level and its solids concentration. Such an examination may show
reasons for discrepancies in certain solids flux models and other clarifier design
assumptions.
Logic:
Water seeks its
own level.
Water is a fluid
(liquid).
Activated sludge acts
as a fluid (liquid).
Therefore: Activated
sludge seeks its own level.
According to technical literature mixed liquor is denser
than the free water in a final clarifier. This fact has been substantiated by
studies showing that the heavier mixed liquor, when entering the final
clarifier basin, drops to the floor or sludge blanket. It then travels along
the floor until it hits an obstruction; normally the peripheral wall for the
center feed clarifier. This wall effect is a major process concern when designing
final clarifiers. There are few reported instances where the solids in a final
clarifier do not reach the wall. It is evident that activated sludge does not
settle as a discreet particle (such as grit or primary solids). Rather, the
activated sludge settles in a hindered zone of influence and is not governed
solely by Stokes law of settling. Activated sludge has no choice but to seek its
own liquid mass level in a clarifier if no mechanical or hydraulic limitations
are imparted on it.
Sludge Concentration
Variance in the Basin
The sludge, most likely, will not be a homogeneous solids
mixture in the sludge blanket, nor will the sludge blanket have a constant
concentration of solids per unit area of the tank floor. At two Wisconsin wastewater
plants, for example, data and measurements of solids in final clarifiers show random
solids contour lines of where the sludge settles.
Since sludge in each plant is different, the relative
concentration will vary, but the ‘random’ pattern of the contours probably will
not. Obviously, these contour lines will not be a perfect circle about the
center line of the basin. A theoretical removal point will pass through as many
as eight different solids contours for half the basin. It would be most
difficult to design a sludge collector for rapid adjustment to each different
concentration point.
Even if there were well defined radial concentration points,
it would be impossible to say where the heavy versus the light sludge would be
at any given time. These contour lines and concentration points would be very
‘flow’ dependent and could vary throughout the day and hour.